Quality
I've been working on creating a review rubric/quality rubric for online educational resources lately. I did a small study in the spring that helped inform us more on the subject. But I've been thinking about the definition of quality. From our rubric I am thinking quality is relative. It depends on the context and dips into Brown's idea of the teacher knowing what they need and adapting the resources (whether that means changing the resource or padding it) to fit their needs. I think a rubric that helps someone assess whether an online resource is of high quality really is for helping teachers (or anyone) assess the basic pieces of the resource so they can then adapt (as needed) the resource to fit into their classroom; where they put the resource into context so the resource has a quality purpose. Of course, there are going to be some resources that just won't fit into what a teacher wants. So for those I would say they are a bad fit. I don't think that necessaril...